Then, convert your artwork to a Symbol (if you use this artwork in multiple places, this is a good idea anyway). Here's a solution - create your artwork and add the Drop Shadow effect. A workaround I've seen from folks is to use the Expand Appearance command (from the Object menu), but that means the effect is no longer "live" and hence, the art can't be easily updated. The result is a drop shadow that may be set to offset down and to the right, but when the art is flipped, the drop shadow is still applied with an offset down and to the right (as seen below).įor those people who regularly do imposition, or those in packaging, this presents a huge problem, and often, these problems aren't detected until it's too late. If you flip your artwork upside down, Illustrator (and InDesign) rotates the art and then reapplies the drop shadow to the art. The shadow isn't "baked in" to the art, and so if the art changes, the drop shadow simply updates itself to match any edits applied to the object. A drop shadow is an effect, and is therefore applied to the overall object. Let's take a closer look at what is happening here. Drop Shadows are applied as live effects, meaning that if you update your artwork or move it, the drop shadow updates and moves as well.īut have you ever applied a drop shadow to an object, and then ROTATED that object so that it's upside down? Have you then taken a closer look at the drop shadow and realized that the drop shadow DIDN'T rotate? Even worse, did you ever see that problem AFTER your job was printed? What I describe happens not only in Illustrator, but in InDesign as well. I would also rethink the direction for the shadow.Illustrator (and just about all Adobe apps for that matter) has the ability to apply the most over-used design effect of all time - Drop Shadows (look out Drop Shadows, reflections aren't far behind). You might try just making the top layer 3D to see what that does. If you are still stuck we need a much more informative screenshot to figure out what is going on. I would start the troubleshooting by soloing the two layers that are giving you problems, press the U key twice to see all modified properties, then start turning things off or resetting the values until you find what is causing the problem. That is not at all how I would have approached the problem. Right now it looks like you just filled the keyed footage of the actor or actors with black and are trying to use that to create a shadow on the ground. Since I can't see what is going on with the 2D layer, which I assume is a keyed layer of at least one of the actors, I think the reason for the shadow copy is acting weird is that there is something else going on in the layer. Usually, if you put a 2D layer above a 3D layer it will mask or cover the 3D layer. The light is coming from the upper right side of the frame but the shadow is falling from the upper left. The first and biggest problem that I see is the direction of the shadow. Here's my guess at the workflow along with a little criticism of the design. When you post a screenshot please select the problem layer or layers and press "uu" to reveal all modified properties so we don't have to guess. It would help if we knew for sure what was going on in the layers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |